Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Page Properties


Target release2019-M1
Epic
Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverIdf37df377-51a7-3f0b-bde6-77fa6960492d
keyEDOP-70
Document status
Status
colourYellow
titleINPROGRESS
Document owner


...

Proposed Repository Structure: (Ranjeet's doc) 

We will have a repository structure same as our layered architecture. We will have multiple repositories divide into followings:

1. Corecore/Infra
2. Business services [Collections, Billing etc]
3. Individual Modules Municipal services[PGR,PT, TL, FNOC etc]
4. MDMS (Application Bootstrapping Configs)
5. Front end (Single Repository with multiple module wise folders)
6. Config (Any other configurations - Centralised) 
7. Seed files for products
8. Config files for persister, indexer, report
9. Libraries [Tracer, mdms-client etc]
10. Docs → Swagger/Open API contracts, web sequence diagrams etc.

...

Core:  DONE
Repo StructureBranching StrategyReview Process
  • egov-accesscontrol
  • egov-common-masters
  • egov-commondata-workflowuploader
    egov-dataenc-uploaderservice
    egov-filestore
    egov-idgen
    egov-indexer
    egov-localization
    egov-location
    egov-mdms-service
    egov-notification-mail
    egov-notification-sms
    egov-otp
    egov-persister
    egov-pg-service
    egov-searcher
    useregov-otptelemetry
    egov-user
    egov-workflow-v2
    libraries
    report
    tenant
  • telemetry
  • telemetry-kafka-streams
New branching structureImage Removed
  • user-otp
    zuul

Image Added

  • Anything in MASTER is deploy-able, all CI/CD pipelines are only from master.
  • Developers are expected to have short-lived feature & hotfix branches which are then merged onto master via PR.
  • Forking workflow is a convenient way to share branches with 3rd party/open-source developers.
  • 3rd party developers follow Forking Workflow, they are pulled into developer’s local repository.

Image RemovedImage Added

  • Everyone creates pull request and only code-owners checks & approves merge to master. Everyone else can still comment.
  • Can elect the code-owners based on tech/files or overall code base and architectural knowledge.
  • Code quality check with codacy is mandatory and runs as part of every pull request.
  • WIP: should be used when there are subsequent commits
  • JIRA ticket should be prefixed as a topic name for the PR
  • Anticipated PRs and the relevant discussions could be discussed on the daily SCRUM meetings.
- Authors, Reviewers, peers, approver

Business Modules:

  • egovbilling-hrmsservice
  • collection-servicesbilling-service
  • egf-instrument
  • egf-masteregf-account-details
  • egov-apportion-service
  • egov-hrms
  • finance-collections-voucher-consumer

New branching structureImage RemovedImage Added

  • Master branch holds the core code and will maintain it own release and review cycle.
  • Developers are expected to have short-lived feature & hotfix branches which are then merged onto master via PR.
  • Forking workflow is a convenient way to share branches with 3rd party/open-source developers.
  • 3rd party developers follow Forking Workflow, they are pulled into developer’s local repository.


Image RemovedImage Added

  • Everyone creates pull request and only code-owners checks & approves merge to master. Everyone else can still comment.
  • Can elect the code-owners based on tech/files or overall code base and architectural knowledge.
  • Code quality check with codacy is mandatory and runs as part of every pull request.
  • WIP: should be used when there are subsequent commits
  • JIRA ticket should be prefixed as a topic name for the PR
  • Anticipated PRs and the relevant discussions could be discussed on the daily SCRUM meetings.
- Authors, Reviewers, peers, approver


Libraries:   DONE

  • mdms-client
  • tracer
  • services-common
New branching structureImage Removed
  • enc-client

Image Added

  • Developers are expected to have short-lived feature & hotfix branches which are then merged onto master via PR.
  • The repository hosts common libraries which are used across core and business modules.
  • The modules hosted in the repo are usually built and artefacts published to Nexus / Artifactory which are then re-used by other modules.
  • Artefacts release and versioning strategies to be followed strictly. 

Image Added

  • Everyone creates pull request and only code-owners checks & approves merge to master. Everyone else can still comment.
  • Can elect the code-owners based on tech/files or overall code base and architectural knowledge.
  • Code quality check with codacy is mandatory and runs as part of every pull request.
  • WIP: should be used when there are subsequent commits
  • JIRA ticket should be prefixed as a topic name for the PR
  • Anticipated PRs and the relevant discussions could be discussed on the daily SCRUM meetings.
- Authors, Reviewers, peers, approver

Municipal services:   DONE

  • Property Tax
  • Trade License
PGR

  • egov-user-event
  • property-services
  • pt-calculator-v2
  • pt-services-v2
  • rainmaker-pgr
  • tl-calculator
  • tl-services



  • Modules are expected to have hooks through which state specific requirements can be met via sidecars rather than introducing the changes into the platform code-base itself.
  • Each of the feature module repos are to contain some sort of deployment packaging to help implementation teams / partners get up and running quickly. (Helm is one such)
  • States can opt to eject out from the platform's release by forking the repository and make any changes in forked repository and handle releases independently.
  • Such forked repositories can sync with upstream and stay up to date with the platform's releases.


  • Everyone creates pull request and only code-owners checks & approves merge to master. Everyone else can still comment.
  • Can elect the code-owners based on tech/files or overall code base and architectural knowledge.
  • Code quality check with codacy is mandatory and runs as part of every pull request.
  • WIP: should be used when there are subsequent commits
  • JIRA ticket should be prefixed as a topic name for the PR
  • Anticipated PRs and the relevant discussions could be discussed on the daily SCRUM meetings.
- Authors, Reviewers, peers, approver



InfraOps: (Private)   DONE

  • Kubernetes manifests
  • Infra configs
  • nginx config
  • kibana config
  • Dockerfiles
  • Jenkins


  • The repository will contain all devops related source code (GitOps) such as kubernetes manifests, configs etc.
  • State or individual deployments is handled by one file per deployment, which in turn affects all other manifests.
  • States can opt to eject out from the platform's release by forking the repository and make any changes in forked repository and handle releases independently.
  • Everyone creates pull request and only code-owners checks & approves merge to master. Everyone else can still comment.
  • Can elect state specific code-owners / implementation team who will be gatekeepers.

Doc:Swagger/Contracts/web  Done

  • Core
  • Business
  • Features
  • Web
  • Mob
  • Option to have it published in confluence


Frontend (UI):

  • citizen
  • employee
  • employee-tradelicence
  • ui-uploader
  • report

Frontend (Mobile):

  • PuraSeva, AP Municipal
  • PGR, mSeva


  • Modules are expected to have hooks through which state specific requirements can be met via sidecars rather than introducing the changes into the platform code-base itself.
  • States can opt to eject out from the platform's release by forking the repository and make any changes in forked repository and handle releases independently.
  • Such forked repositories can sync with upstream and stay up to date with the platform's releases.
  • States also have the option to use their own UI while using our APIs alone.
https://levelup.gitconnected.com/using-pre-commit-and-pre-push-git-hooks-in-a-react-project-6c83431ef2bd

Config-Files: (Common)

  • Seed files
  • Migration files 
  • Persister  – Service repo
  • Indexer - Service repo






...